[Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925


Matt Domsch <matt_domsch@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |matt_domsch@xxxxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch <matt_domsch@xxxxxxxx>  2009-08-29 09:05:17 EDT ---
In private mail with Simon, he is happy for others to maintain libowfat in
epel, but he has no interest in doing so himself at this time.  As noted above,
libowfat is needed for opentracker.  I'm not planning on building libowfat
against dietlibc in epel, but against glibc, as epel has no dietlibc.

Please branch EL-5 from devel if you can.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: libowfat
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: mdomsch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]