Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-17 07:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > #12 - if you're using rawhide, the version of mono shipped is architecture > agnostic so on a 64 bit box, things go into /usr/lib64. Under FC5, everything > is under /usr/lib I'm using FC5 and it's not, apparently. > I'll need to check on the errors you're seeing as I can't reproduce them here. Build log attached. > #11 - it's done that way so I can see what's going on (needed for the time > being, I'll switch to -q on the next release). The patch is invoked on > anything above FC5 Apparently that's what you meant, but that's not what happens. I.e. it gets called on fc5, too. Ah, I see the problem. Change all %if "%{?fedora}" to %if "%{fedora}" i.e. without the question mark. Still, some files get installed in %{_libdir} nonetheless: File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so File not found: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc Full build.log attached (built with my fix %{?fedora} -> %{fedora}). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review