[Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239





--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-08-27 15:41:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> * Rpmlint
> - There are comments in the spec file to indicate that the permissions need to
> be more restrictive than rpmlint wants because passwords are stored in those
> config files so they cannot be world readable.
It can not be applicable for files like /etc/horde/ansel/styles.php.dist.
If you use such extra permissions - it must be minimum and commented.

> - The xml files are not marked as no replace because they are replace during
> upgrade and should not be edited by users.
There one xml-file - /etc/horde/ansel/conf.xml. So, ok, if it configuration for
horde provided by package this warning may be ignored. But in this case really
it altogether should be marked as %config?

> * License
> - I have emailed upstream for clarity on the named files
> - The carousel.js is from Prototype-UI http://www.prototype-ui.com/ which
> according to the developer is not production ready
Why??? Prototype is famous framework and have several stable releases -
http://prototypejs.org/download
And I think it should not be difficult to package...

> * Dependency
> - Ansel requires horde which in turn require PHP which in turn required httpd
> which means the dependency will be resolved without explicitly requiring httpd  

No, it is not:
$ rpm -qp --requires ansel-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm
/usr/bin/env
/usr/bin/php
config(ansel) = 1.0-3.fc11
horde >= 3
php-gd >= 4.3.0
php-pear(MDB2)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1


You miss my additional point - should ansel require exactly httpd (implicit or
explicit)? Meta "webserver" don't satisfactory us?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]