Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #10 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-26 10:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hello Arnaldo, > > Please consider the following comments: > > 1) oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope > > Here: "Summary: Generic Oscilloscope" > > Are there other good summary that doesn't use "Oscilloscope" word? Replaced with: Summary: Generic graphical signal plotting tool > 2) oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib > > It seems that rpmlint confused by "lib" string wrongly, concluding that it is a > package that contains an ELF shared library that should be depended on > automatically. IMO, it's ok. Ah, that makes sense, agreed. > 3) tuna.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tuna/oscilloscope.py 0644 /usr/bin/python > > Will oscilloscope.py be executed (fix permission) or not? > If not, I think that /usr/bin/python line could be removed. Done > Cheers, > Douglas Thanks! New files at: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9-3.fc11.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna.spec http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review