Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 bruno.cornec@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bruno.cornec@xxxxx| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec@xxxxxx 2006-09-16 19:22 EST ------- Thanks for looking at the package. the %post section is to avoid what happens frequently is a dual installation of tar.gz mindi and .rpm mindi with different versions. Depending on PATH it creates issues. That message is just here to prevent people doing that unintentionaly. In what way is it a problem ? (it doesn't break unattended installation as I've seen earlier). Concerning statically built binaries, it is provided upstream like that. It's a busybox version recompiled for mindi. Of course the .config file is provided so information on how to rebuild is there. mindi doesn't support other arch than x86, x86_64 and ia64, for which there is another busybox binary. That binary is just used during restore to create a mini-Unix environement. It would imply an upstream change to modify that, which is not planned yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review