Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-08-24 08:13:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Updated the spec file with the changes suggested. Thanks! > I updated the spec file to require webserver instead of httpd but I am unsure > if I should own /etc/httpd. Could you please explain this a bit as I seem to be > missing something here. If you create a directory that neither you nor none of your dependencies own, that directory would not be removed upon package removal. That could happen in case user would elect to use e.g. lighttpd instead of apache httpd (which would satisfy the webserver dependency). So you can either depend on "webserver" and own /etc/httpd, or depend directly on "httpd" (as you did previously). It might be a better idea to just switch back to httpd (since you use apache:apache user, etc.); sorry for the noise. Also, please improve your %description, it seems rather short and uninformative. I don't think any of these are blockers, I'll approve the package once you are sponsored. Please apply for packagers group so that you can get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review