Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Allisson Azevedo <allisson@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo <allisson@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-20 11:53:06 EDT --- [+] source files match upstream: [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. This is a noarch package. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617869 [+] package installs properly. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. Please modify URL and Source to use macros before import to CVS: URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/%{name} Source: http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review