Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-19 16:53:52 EDT --- Review: • rpmlint: source clean. binary has one warning: changelog incoherent anjal.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.3 ['0.1.0-0.4.20090813git2d4e6a0.fc12', '0.1.0-0.4.20090813git2d4e6a0'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. • package name: OK • spec file name: OK • package guideline-compliant: OK • license complies with guidelines: valid but bizarre (author does not trust FSF enough to use LGPLv2+ ?) • license field accurate: OK • license file not deleted: OK • spec in US English: OK • spec legible: OK • source matches upstream: OK • builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) • build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) • locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK • own all directories: OK • no dupes in %files: OK • permission: OK • %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK • macros used consistently: OK • Package contains code: OK • desktop file uses desktop-file-install: desktop-file-validate, OK • clean buildroot before install: OK • filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD • package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) • package functioned as described: OK (tested on x86_64) • scriplets are sane: OK • require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review