[Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-08-19 13:44:20 EDT ---
Two items of note:

1. Instead of using sed to try to stop configure from running twice (it doesn't
work), do this:

# run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice.
NOCONFIGURE=true ./autogen.sh

That works because the provided autogen.sh just calls out to gnome-autogen.sh,
which has some intelligence.

2. Do you want to pass --enable-scaled-background to configure?

== Review ==

Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
mutter-moblin.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libmoblin-panel.so.0.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx
mutter-moblin-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mutter-moblin-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so moblin-netbook.so.3400.0.0

All safe to ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
(c781f9a6558167658fc7891d1ba8c041db1a75113ef220441c05f11a877436ed)
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales handled properly
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

Address the first two issues before commit, but this is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]