Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2009-08-18 11:10:23 EDT --- > Note that I've just checked the current hg sources, and apparently the latest > have changed quite a bit since 1.3.4. They've switched away from autotools for > the build for instance, and the GUI seems to be included. > I think sticking with the released version for now is best, though it will mean > major changes to the spec/build once the next version is out. OK, thanks for the information. I've checked out the sources from the hg repo and tried to build the binaries. It's quite easy. The whole build process can be done with if [ -f bin/hm.cfg ] then ./hm.sh build else echo 1 | ./hm.sh build fi Thus, it shouldn't be too complicated to adapt the spec file later. But I agree that it's currently better to stick with the official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review