Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #49 from Gareth John <gareth.l.john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-17 18:00:12 EDT --- Ok all done for your last recommendations have done one review as you know I will get another under my belt this week. I also upgraded to F11 during the past two weeks. In case the dist tag puzzles you as it has indeed changed. Also the ARCH has changed due to this again hope thats ok?? Further to that i questioned if -DOC files should be pulled in as docs or as standard files or doc as it presents a warning i am resigned to the fact that this will probably need to be done as i have opted to pull them in as normal files. ================================================= files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-9.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec ================================================== $ rpmlint gtkmm-utils.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-9.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/gtkmm-utils-* gtkmm-utils-devel.i586: W: no-documentation gtkmm-utils-example.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review