Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #21 from Patrick Monnerat <pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-14 13:29:20 EDT --- Thanks Spot, but this was the "clear" part, and my question was not! My question is about package NAMING: is is a fourth case (after prerelease, snapshot and postrelease) where the %release should contain a specific alpha string ? (AFAIK, these are the only kind of packages that are allowed to contain a main tarball that is not directly downloadable from upstream). Or do I keep the regular package naming, breaking the "downloadable from upstream" rule ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review