Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian <christof@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-13 15:23:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is this essentially the same thing as bug 351441? Do the same issues which > caused the closure of that review still apply? I didn't see that bug. But I guess they still apply. I had a quick grep through the sources and found these in the vendor directories: ./lib/plugins/sfCompat10Plugin/lib/vendor: phpmailer ./lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor: doctrine ./lib/plugins/sfPropelPlugin/lib/vendor: phing, propel, propel-generator ./lib/vendor: lime - phpmailer, phing, propel and propel-generator are already available in Fedora. - doctrine isn't. - lime is just used by symfony anyway, as far as I know. It is just one file. Personally I think it is not a big problem, because symfony requires certain versions of the libraries. For example if I create a doctrine package of the current 1.1 it probably won't work with symfony 1.2. I would suggest bringing symfony into Fedora as is, with the plan to remove these duplicated libraries in one of the next releases where possible. I think this was how it was done in other packages which bundled libraries. Then I probably would: - remove the sfCompat10Plugin with the ancient phpmailer completely. - create the doctrine package, which I planned anyway. - check if symmfony works with the fedora propel & phing packages. If it doesn't I would remove that plugin too. - create a patch to make symfony look at the default library locations instead of vendor directories. Thank god I don't have to think about EPEL, because RHEL is still stuck at PHP 5.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review