Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #50 from Joshua Rosen <bjrosen@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-13 14:37:59 EDT --- I have a review question. I've downloaded the files for 481030, pmd-emacs and fetched the source file using spectool -g. Are all the sources including patches required to be in that file or is reviewer supposed to install the SRPM? Does the source archive format matter? This package was supplies as a .zip instead of a .tar.gz or a .tar.bz2. Zip is not a standard way to archive files on a *nix system although it's fully supported. Also should I be posting my review comments on that bug report given that I'm doing this as a learning experience? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review