Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-12 13:23:40 EDT --- And here's the review of this package: rpmlint output: sys_basher.src: W: strange-permission sys_basher.spec 0770 sys_basher.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.9-1 ['1.1.19-1.fc11', '1.1.19-1'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Still, the spec file you used to generate the srpm has strange permissions. Run chmod 644 on it and regenerate the srpm. Fix the version in the changelog as well. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - You need to fix the source URL: $ spectool -g sys_basher.spec --2009-08-12 20:20:24-- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.19.tar.gz Resolving www.polybus.com... 38.113.1.181 Connecting to www.polybus.com|38.113.1.181|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-08-12 20:20:25 ERROR 404: Not Found. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - During compilation I get sys_disk.c: In function 'fileWrite': sys_disk.c:150: warning: implicit declaration of function 'open' you might want to fix this. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review