Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-14 10:50 EST ------- * updated spec: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec * script to build the tarball from cvs: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm-cvs.sh * updated SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc5.src.rpm 1. Well, I made a little script that download a cvs snapshot and compress it in a tarball. I'm not sure why, but md5sum between 2 snapshots are always different though diff -Naur between 2 directories shows no difference. 2. done 3. looks like m4 macros are mostly located in /usr/include, so I put them there. 4. Since i automated the generation of the tarball, I made minor changes like enabling maintainer mode in %configure, this is necessary to enable specific parts of makefiles without them the build will fail. (So I had to add libtool as a BR) 5. builds in mock for fc5 i386 & fc6 i386 configuration, new package seems working, rpmlint output: W: gtkmozembedmm-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review