Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-10 02:44:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ralf, > > Yes, the way upstream hosts the software is not ideal Not ideal? I am questioning that this package is more than a 3rd lesson programming beginner's exercise and a package at all. > but we do not control it. Then do your job and encourage upstream to do convert their script into a usable and useful package. We do so on many occasions, so why did you fail to do so now? > It can only be requested to be changed and that information along with other > suggestions from you has been conveyed upstream. Like you said, it is a trivial > script and I am confident we can improve it via updates instead of holding up > the review. I think we should reject the this script until upstream has converted into a package. Fedora is not programming beginner's kindergarden nor a pool for silly scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review