Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #3 from Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev@xxxxxxx> 2009-08-08 22:20:27 EDT --- Kevin, Thanks for review! (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. Looking at the files here, it looks like the License should be: > ASL 1.1 and GPLv2+ > The ant parts seem to be under the ASL1.1, and the rest is GPLv2 or later. > Unless there is something I am missing there... Of course, you are right. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/license.html I've admired by the juridical/technical trick of copyright holder, and forgot about my first wrong assumption. Now, it is corrected. BTW I hope, the spec file won't be considered as a thing that links software with incompatible licenses. See here: http://cobertura.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cobertura/trunk/cobertura/src/net/sourceforge/cobertura/ant/package.html?view=markup The second release is prepared for review: Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura-1.9-2.fc12.src.rpm Changes: * The license tag is changed The rpmlint tool shows 0 errors, 0 warnings against SRPM and all RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review