Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-05 03:55:17 EDT --- OK, upstream has released a new version that has removed any mention of the FORM license. Now it should be clear enough that JaxoDraw is under GPLv2+. The stylefile is under LPPL, but it isn't linked in any way to JaxoDraw. Removing FE-LEGAL. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw-2.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output is jaxodraw-latex.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review