Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-04 10:47:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > It's not, which is why it's wrong. > > I see. I don't want to argue, but both the tarball and the package are not > capitalized ether. No, and that's expected. > > It's not anything like Totem in terms of features, > > Agreed > > > and the only somewhat GNOME-y dependency is GConf. > > Please don't forget gnome-themes (why?) Because nobody bothered to file a bug, should really be gnome-icon-theme. Fixed in rawhide. > and control-center It doesn't. > and evolution-data > server (through totem-pl-parser) It doesn't either. > plus all their deps. Totem's dependency chain > is rather long, at least in Fedora. > > I will change summary and description as soon as somebody picks up this review. > > P.S.: Bastien, would you mind replying to bug 488558, which is in NEEDINFO for > 6 more than 6 weeks now? TIA! Answered there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review