Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-04 07:52:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > > duplicate. OK > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > > consistently. NEEDSWORK > > - If you use tabbing, do it properly: remove the extra space from Summary, > > Version, Release and so on. > There only tabs. On case mixing it, rpmlint comply it. That was a general expression - remove the extra tabs. > > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > > provided in the spec URL. ?? > > - Upstream website is down. > I known. :( > What you can suggest do with that? Must I "fork" project to continue? I guess we just have to live with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review