Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-03 13:15:58 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/moblin-sound-theme-0.3-1.fc12.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: CC-BY-SA OK - MUST: license field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: source matches upstream source by MD5 9f8866cd02f9aa3a0eec659a8ea78e75 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 (Note: noarch package) OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains permissable content OK - MUST: no large docs OK - MUST: files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - Source0 valid Issues: - add NEWS to %doc (README is currently not worth adding) - preserve timestamps during install (similar to #507480) - use install rather than cp, e. g.: install -pm 0644 index.theme %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/sounds/moblin/ for file in stereo/{*.wav,*.ogg}; do install -pm 0644 $file %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/sounds/moblin/stereo/ done - Don't add dependencies on /bin/touch: "... ditto if "touch" is not available, there's nothing that would benefit from icon cache updates installed yet either." Source: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache If you really think you should require something, use the cureutils package instead of a file based dep. Fix the issues and consider this package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review