Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-08-03 08:28:38 EDT --- $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC rfc822.c is under MIT license. Only the man page has any mention of a GPL (GPLv2+) license. Please ask upstream to clarify this. ** The current GPLv2+ license marking is correct: if the source code or COPYING doesn't specify a version ("released under GPL"), then the license tag is GPL+. The same is used if the COPYING is some version of the GPL without a specification what license the program is under. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review