Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-02 08:45:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * ruby(abi) > - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > ( And I usually recomend to add also "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > for consistency ). Well, that doesn't work on EPEL 5, because there's no ruby(abi) provided. $ rpm -q ruby ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7 $ $ rpm -q --provides ruby | grep "ruby(abi)" $ As the ruby ABI anyway won't change on RHEL 5 during its lifetime, I don't see a need for this. If it makes you happy, I can add a "ruby = 1.8.5" as a hard requirement, but seems to be unnecessary. > * ImageMagick Dependency > - Due to bug 500565 (i.e due to the function > static void test_Magick_version(void) in ext/RMagick/rmmain.c), > when ruby-RMagick is rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.0, RMagick > will require ImageMagick 6.2.8.X > > ( i.e. even if the soname of the library in ImageMagick won't change > between 6.2.8.X and 6.2.9.Y, RMagick rebuilt with ImageMagick > 6.2.8.X won't work with ImageMagick 6.2.9.Y (by default) ). Well, ImageMagick is from RHEL thus never will get incompatible upgraded and there never will be a version upgrade, just security backports. If ImageMagick would get upgraded on RHEL, that would anyway break many things. I can add a hard dependency to "ImageMagick = 6.2.8.0", if that makes you happy. Next RHEL will anyway need ruby-RMagick 2.x. > * htmldoc > - Would you explain why you pass "--disable-htmldoc" to configure? > ( By the way it seems that creating html documents also fixes > shebangs automatically ) > ! By the way as far as I am correct "BR: libwmf" is needed when creating > html documents, would you check that? Building documentation fails, that verdana.ttf or arial.ttf is required but not available on the system. It's looking for /usr/share/fonts/defaults/ TrueType/<fontname>, if I remember the path correctly. Nothing at Fedora is seemingly providing that. > * configure v.s. setup.rb > - Well, I think if "configure -> make" is used to compile RMagick, > "make install" or so should be used to install files. > > If you use "ruby setup.rb install", perhaps "ruby setup.rb config/setup" > or so is preferable instead of "configure -> make". Maybe I did something wrong, but that way I was not able to build the package. There's a *.h.in and another *.in for example which only gets handled by the ./configure, otherwise the build poorly failed for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review