Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #4 from Cédric OLIVIER <cedric.olivier@xxxxxxx> 2009-08-02 07:19:11 EDT --- Hello, Thanks for your review, I am updating this rpm with all your comments. following rpmlint traces : rpmlint SPECS/josm.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/noarch/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/noarch/josm-javadoc-0-1788svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint SRPMS/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/josm.spec http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.src.rpm Not yet realized : * remove .svn file and other uneeded stuff. * bash script for generating tarball from the subversion repository * package manual (I don't actually know how to do it) jfcUnit seems to not be used in josm, I have asked the josm-dev list to confirm it. I am packaging gettext-commons, I will submit soon a review for it. Bests regards. Cédric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review