Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-01 14:45:00 EDT --- Oh, and I didn't even notice the /usr/local. No Fedora package can ever put anything there. Glancing at the spec, there are various other significant issues. Is there any specific reason not to just use cpanspec to autogenerate a package? The package it generates needs slight editing (check the License:, tweak the %description) but otherwise would lead to a quick approval. If you really want to roll your own, I recommend at least looking to the cpanspec-generated spec or the specfile templates in the packaging guidelines for an idea of how to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review