[Bug 512726] Review Request: perl-Test-Refcount - Assert reference counts on objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512726


Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |skasal@xxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |skasal@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-31 10:46:54 EDT ---
OK source files match upstream, sha1sum:
  c943efd0c268e812fa9ed6176ea1630e3de17c86  Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
FAIL specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
%files should contain "%{perl_vendorlib}/Test" to avoid packing the auto
subdir.
  You might also want to use %{_mandir}/man3/Test*.3*
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible.
OK license text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
FAIL BuildRequires are proper.
   add: perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod)
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock.
OK package installs properly.
OK no debuginfo package
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires are sane:
FAIL %check is present and all tests pass.
   The test suite fails.  The reason is probably a bug in Devel::FindRef,
   I filed it as https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=48357
   Add a comment mentioning this, including the link to the bug.
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
FAIL file permissions are appropriate.
   - the manpage and *.pm is read only, this is unusual
   - consider calling "%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*"
OK no scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers, pkgconfig files, libtool .la droppings, nor desktop files

Nicolas, please fix the above issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]