Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-11 16:25 EST ------- condrestart still seems the proper way of doing it for xinetd. 1) don't try to send signals to non-existing processes 2) don't try and start something that isn't running 3) we don't want to return errors in exit codes when failing to signal something non-existing Is there any reason why *not* to use condrestart? Perhaps proftpd and uw-imapd send the signals because they also have a standalone mode without being run from inetd? I did not know about chkconfig not needing the --add command. Sorry about that. I would still like to see a new package to test. Or if you want to wait on the proxy testing, that's fine too, but that might take me a day or two to get around to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review