[Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822





--- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-29 21:19:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you don't hear from upstream, there are a couple of possibilities.  If they
> won't reply to a simple question like that, how are they going to reply to bug
> reports?  Is it worth packaging software with an absent upstream?

They've been responsive to other issues, so I'm assuming this issue is just
below their radar.

Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]