Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514452 --- Comment #1 from Sean Flanigan <sflaniga@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-29 04:02:59 EDT --- Hi Asgeir, Looking pretty good! I'm looking forward to seeing Agilo packaged. About the versioning, there are some examples of Fedora packages which use (eg) 4.2.98 to mean version 4.3RC3 (kdeartwork), but the naming guidelines suggest using the expected "final" version (0.8.0 in this case) with a 0.x release, eg 0.8.0-0.1.RC2. I'm not sure exactly when one style is preferred over the other, but I like the guideline style, if only because it produces more predictable numbers. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages Sean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review