[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitlbee


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxx  2006-09-11 11:19 EST -------
chkconfig --add bitlbee will just make sure the service is "registered" with the
management system that programs such as ntsysv use to enable/disable services.
>From the man page:

       --add name

              This option adds a new  service  for  management  by  chkconfig.
              When  a new service is added, chkconfig ensures that the service
              has either a start or a kill entry in  every  runlevel.  If  any
              runlevel  is missing such an entry, chkconfig creates the appro-
              priate entry as specified by the  default  values  in  the  init
              script.  Note  that default entries in LSB-delimited ’INIT INFO’
              sections take precedence  over  the  default  runlevels  in  the
              initscript.

install -m ... vs %makeinstall and perl. I personally like the install -m lines
over perl replacements of Makefiles. But whatever you decide is fine.

I still need to do more testing with the proxy stuff. I wouldn't stall the
package on that though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]