Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-11 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > 1. If the license is LGPL (as it appears to be), no need to include the > COPYING file as that is the GPL. doc/xml.html says: This library is released both under the W3C Copyright and the GNU LGPL. The only GPL bits appear to be the buildsystem (e.g. libtool), so I've dropped the COPYING file. > 2. The devel package has: > Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version} > That should probibly be: > Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Done. > 3. rpmlint says: > E: libxml-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > W: libxml-devel no-documentation > > I think those can both be ignored in this case. I agree. Next version: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml-1.8.17-15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review