Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnuea |armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnue |bi-binutils - A GNU |abi-binutils - A GNU |collection of binary |collection of binary |utilities |utilities --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-28 09:32:42 EDT --- Ok, after some googling, I suspect that the only proper way is to use "unknown" as vendor field, since it definitely shows, that our cross-toolchain intended for wide use and not locked to some particular hardware. See also these links: http://www.mail-archive.com/autoconf@xxxxxxx/msg00969.html http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=1&chap=3 Here is a brief answer for my question from Ralf Corsepius: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.arm/191/focus=117221 Here are the previous Fedora-related discussions about cross-compiling in general: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/41315 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/56709 Ok, renamed back and updated to the latest "main" binutils: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-30.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review