Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-11 04:44 EST ------- * updated spec: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec * updated SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-3.fc5.src.rpm 0. License has been added (LGPL) 1. this is a mistake, the previous package didn't follow naming guidelines. Since the last tarball available is 2 years old and no more working, I'm using a cvs snapshot (17/08/2006 currently). I tested the sources, and I can compile and launch a minimal web browser using the bindings. 2. the autotools scripts requires mozilla-gtkmozembed.pc, so I added a conditional build requires on firefox-devel for FC6+ (plus a sed script to require firefox-gtkmozembed.pc) and mozilla-devel for older release. I didn't test the fc6 package but it builds fine under mock. 3. gtkmozembedmm has no web place except gnome cvs, but gtkmm mailing-lists provide some support. The binding is listed here: http://gtkmm.sourceforge.net/extra.shtml 4. done 5. done 6. the install-sh script is a symlink to /usr/share/automake-1.9/install-sh , I added automake-1.9 as BR, now the package builds in mock for fc5/f6 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review