[Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754


Gareth John <gareth.l.john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gareth.l.john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                   |                            |m, jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Gareth John <gareth.l.john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-27 20:48:49 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.

The spec will not build without removing source 1 and source 2 lines. After
they were removed rpmlint gives the following errors. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
moblin-session.i386: E: no-binary

The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any
binaries.

Solution:- Then you can add to SPEC file BuildArchitectures: noarch 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
W: moblin-session.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/moblin/xinitrc

A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

Solution:- under %files section you can add %config /etc/xdg/moblin/xinitrc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
W: moblin-session.i386: E: non-executable-script /etc/xdg/moblin/xinitrc 0644
/bin/sh

Solution:- will come soon unless you find it. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also following optional guidelines "* SHOULD: If the source package does not
include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD
query upstream to include it. [27]" The following the mandatory guidelines you
should include this file in the %doc section when released upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]