[Bug 511212] Review Request: cluster-glue - reusable clustering components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212





--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-27 19:40:24 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
See below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
a9aba6ae59030a148dd95bfea163852c  75cab275433e.tar.gz
ecc791dec7788293ad3d7f22b1d80cf5  75cab275433e.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. 
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed. 

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. What is the 'uid' define for? 

2. You should use %global instead of %define. 

3. Is this a pre-release for version 1.0? Or a post release of 0.9? or
something else?
The release might need adjustment. See: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release
I suspect it should be something like: 1.0.0-0.0.75cab275433e ?

4. The %{configure} macro should pass all of these I think, so no need to do
so: 
                --prefix=%{_prefix} \
                --localstatedir=%{_var} \
                --libdir=%{_libdir}

5. Your source doesn't match the upstream Source url. Perhaps you are using a
checkout? 
It needs to match exactly. 

6. rpmlint says: 
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/nobody
0700
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/root
0700
cluster-glue.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/daemon
0700
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.

I think those can be ignored.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]