Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #18 from Tomas Hoger <thoger@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-27 04:58:20 EDT --- Ok. This still does not seem to have a very good 'required disk space on mirrors' vs. 'expected number of users of the package' ratio, but maybe it's just me. I'd still consider splitting those private keys subpackages into one with expected keys sizes (1024, 2048, 4096) and those of size less likely to be used in the wild (1023, 2047). Have you seen any research on most commonly used ssh key sizes? Do you have a tool that can be given a pid range and it'll generate all keys in the range? So the effort in generating missing keys can be split across multiple systems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review