Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Julian Aloofi <julian.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Julian Aloofi <julian.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-26 19:12:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Requires: lzma is not enough IMHO. The package seems to need also tar, gzip and > > bzip2. > > Yes, you are right, the 'archiver class' shows points that let indicate that > all this tools are needed. You are still using the old spec file in the Spec URL link, but the one in the SRPM is good. By the way, tar gzip and bzip2 are in the Base group anyway, you can't install Fedora without them. I wonder why these packages are not in the exception list in the Guidelines. I can't see any further problems with the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review