Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-26 15:26:37 EDT --- ok. Finally found some time to look at this a bit. ;) So, my understanding is that this is a newerversion/fork of heartbeat thats stripped down and only has the parts pacemaker needs/wants in it. Is that correct or am I misunderstanding? :) First, Fedora really would prefer to avoid Conflicts if at all possible. (See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts). So, is there some way we can avoid that here? - Can this package just rename the dirs/files that conflict with 'cluster-glue' or something and that way they could both be installed and pacemaker could have a compile time option to use whichever one. (Or autodetect it based on the files found, etc). - Is using this better than using heartbeat for pacemaker? Or are they the same? If the same, perhaps we hold off on adding this to fedora for now, let pacemaker use heartbeat and then down the road when enough folks have moved to pacemaker submit this and obsolete heartbeat? - Perhaps pacemaker could fold in the needed parts of this and just use them internally and avoid conflict with heartbeat that way? Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review