Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-26 05:37:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #26) > > apbs has support for: > > --with-mpich=PATH toplevel MPICH directory > > --with-mpich2=PATH toplevel MPICH2 directory > > --with-lam=PATH toplevel LAM-MPI directory > > --with-openmpi enable OpenMPI compilation > > so I suggest you add these to the package in the future. > > > > Will do. Just no hurry - wait until the two drafts become guidelines :) ** > > - There are tests in examples/, run them in %check with clip > some of the directories don't contain makefiles, so instead I'm using: clip > This works, but the resulting examples take ~4hrs to run on my AMD opteron 275. > I can cut it down to a 1-2 of the examples... Ugh. Do they give an error code if the result is not the wanted one..? You could probably just drop the %check phase. ** Package does not build: RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyc File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyo This is due to RPM in Fedora 11 not byte compiling files in %{_bindir}. Instead of %exclude you could just delete the files after %install with rm -f which doesn't complain about possible non-existing files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review