Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511246 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Beekhof <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-24 05:41:56 EDT --- Another update: - Include an AUTHORS and license file in each package - Change the library package name to pacemaker-libs to be more Fedora compliant - Remove execute permissions from xml related files - Update the tarball from upstream to version c9120a53a6ae - Reference the new cluster-glue devel package name SPEC: http://oss.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/fedora/pacemaker.spec SRPM: http://oss.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/fedora/pacemaker-1.0.4-3.fc12.src.rpm Current rpmlint output follows: [beekhof@rawhide pacemaker]$ rpmlint /home/beekhof/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pacemaker-*.rpm pacemaker.spec pacemaker.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/pengine 0750 pacemaker.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/heartbeat/crm 0750 pacemaker.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/crm 0750 pacemaker-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcrmcluster.so.1.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx pacemaker-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpengine.so.3.0.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx pacemaker-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcib.so.1.0.1 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx pacemaker.spec:177: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf pacemaker.spec:178: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d pacemaker.spec:179: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/pacemaker 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. All remaining errors/warnings are discussed in the initial description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review