Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #25 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-23 01:33:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > > > Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them > > > > separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right? > > > > > > What do you mean, break Fedora licensing..? > > > > Sorry, that didn't sound right - I meant combining libaqua/pmgZ (LGPLv2+) with > > libapbs (BSD) into a single library isn't compatible with fedora licensing? > > No problem, BSD is compatible with LGPL, so the result is LGPLv2+. I did not know that. Well, here's the combined version: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review