[Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: codeblocks


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-09-09 19:55 EST -------
I can't check the upstream source.  Could you provide a quick script in the
package for grabbing the source from the repository and generating the tarball?
 I know if won't compare the same due to directory timestamps but I can at least
do a recursive diff.

Any reason why you don't use the %configure macro instead of listing out that
long configure line?

/usr/lib64/codeblocks seems to be unowned.

You don't seem to install the desktop file properly.  Generally you should use
desktop-file-install.

X source files match upstream (can't check)
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has only ignorable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   codeblocks-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libastyle.so()(64bit)
   libautosave.so()(64bit)
   libclasswizard.so()(64bit)
   libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit)
   libcodecompletion.so()(64bit)
   libcompiler.so()(64bit)
   libdebuggergdb.so()(64bit)
   libdefaultmimehandler.so()(64bit)
   libscriptedwizard.so()(64bit)
   libtodo.so()(64bit)
   codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
   libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit)
   libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.3)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)

  codeblocks-contrib-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libbyogames.so()(64bit)
   libcb_koders.so()(64bit)
   libcodesnippets.so()(64bit)
   libcodestat.so()(64bit)
   libdragscroll.so()(64bit)
   libenvvars.so()(64bit)
   libexporter.so()(64bit)
   libhelp_plugin.so()(64bit)
   libkeybinder.so()(64bit)
   libprofiler.so()(64bit)
   libwxsmith.so()(64bit)
   codeblocks-contrib = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6
  =
   codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6
   libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0()(64bit)
   libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit)

  codeblocks-devel-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   codeblocks-devel = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6
  =
   codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6
   libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit)
   pkgconfig

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths; ldconfig is
called as necessary and unversioned .so files are in the -devel package.
* package is not relocatable.
X owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* header files are content used by the package.
* pkgconfig file is in the -devel package.
* no libtool .la droppings.
X desktop file does not seem to be installed properly.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]