Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-22 13:56:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > > > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs > > > > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect > > > > this. > > > > > > > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW. > > > > > > Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should be > > > just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs... > > > > Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them > > separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right? > > What do you mean, break Fedora licensing..? Sorry, that didn't sound right - I meant combining libaqua/pmgZ (LGPLv2+) with libapbs (BSD) into a single library isn't compatible with fedora licensing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review