[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622





--- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-22 13:56:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > > > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs
> > > > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect
> > > > this.
> > > >
> > > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW.  
> > > 
> > > Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should be
> > > just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs...  
> > 
> > Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them
> > separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right?  
> 
> What do you mean, break Fedora licensing..?  

Sorry, that didn't sound right - I meant combining libaqua/pmgZ (LGPLv2+) with
libapbs (BSD) into a single library isn't compatible with fedora licensing?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]