[Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788





--- Comment #3 from Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-22 12:50:40 EDT ---
> [FAILED] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
>  %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT?

Foiled by rpmdev-newspec. Changed to macro format for consistency.



> [FAILED] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.

Guidelines say: "SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity." --
it does not say that ScriptletSnippets are the only acceptable ones.

This scriptlet seems sane to me, and is similar to what the ssh server package
does when it generates a host key.



> [FAILED] license is open source-compatible.
>  uh www/background.jpg looks fairly familiar to something from OS X, please
check
>  also please check with upstream on all artwork and perhaps CSS/JS

Checking with upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]