Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #30 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-22 06:14:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Yes, in that other use case. 'less times' is the other use case when there is > nobody at console, or she's effectively (knows nothing) there. Off course. But what about login over ssh as root, became user (su to it) with its environment, and again, just starts x11vnc... Off course we can imagine many other cases where hunter on magic cookie file is needed, but in most of them I think you are known what you do... > Why? Because we must be closer to upstream as much as possible. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream > - we make initscripts and other distro-integration scipts ourselves. Key there "distro-integration". So, init-scripts is distro dependent and Fedora specific in most of cases. > - file locations for those MIT cookies falls into distro's configuration. > That would make the script unnecessary complex to cover all distros. File locations for those MIT cookies is also standardized less or more, as I can understand. And include 3 or 4 additional paths in find process for most useful places is not problem. > IMO, that does not belong to upstream. IMHO, if it is useful future, it will be very cool in any case speak with upstream. So, if upstream do not want even speak about it, then we can continue discuss about include it as Fedora-specific part only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review