Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-21 15:51:29 EDT --- This seems to be an interesting project - nice to have it packaged for Fedora. I will look forward to play with it. I have looked briefly at the package. Upstream tar contains GPLv3 LICENSE file. But PKG-INFO has "License: UNKNOWN" and I can't find any other references to what role the LICENSE file has - if it is GPLv3 only or if later versions also can be used. Why are you using the license tag GPLv3+? Anyway: Upstream should be asked to clarify the license. Upstream has released 0.9.3 - please base the package on that version. Or perhaps go directly to one of the 1.0 pre releases where the chances of getting changes upstreamed are bigger. The package installs a python library and a management binary. I am not familiar with lamson (except for quick browsing through the fine documentation), but using Fedora terminology i would call it an mail application server framework. The application group you have chosen supports that. It can easily generate a mail server which can and should be customized, but that doesn't make it a mail server. It isn't a running server in which you can create mail applications, but it can create individual "servers" for each application. I suggest that you make that clearer in the description. I would expect a mail server to be integrated with Fedora, with for example init.d script and logging to /var/log, and it should only require minimal configuration to get up and running. Obviously those who use lamson as a framework doesn't want that. But perhaps that could be placed in a subpackage? And perhaps a default mail server in an (other?) subpackage? Perhaps the main package could contain an init.d scripts which starts the lamson servers listed in a sysconfig file? I expect lamson mail servers to have issues with SElinux. Have you tried or any opinion on that? But again, as long as the lamson package is a framework and not a server then SElinux isn't its business... -- reviews/sponsor wanted for tortoisehg on bug 509936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review