Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512725 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-21 07:10:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 2 remarks: > > * ... > %{perl_vendorarch}/* > %exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ > > I for one find using > %{perl_vendorarch}/Devel > %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Devel > much more readable and less error-prone It makes sense to me, I will adopt this new scheme. > * Nicolas, are you familiar with cpanspec? > Me thinks, you might be one of the very few persons who are still manually > writing perl-specs from scratch. I wasn't using cpanspec until now, but it showed some interesting differences that I've missed, over rpmdev-newspec using perl default template. (ex Module::Build specifics) I will convert the spec with cpanspec... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review