Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-21 05:15:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > Although technically your solution is correct, I think that performance wise it > > > is better to use: > > Yes, I known how make conditional BR, but it is what I try avoid there > Just for my info: why do you want to avoid it ? This is look ugly. I every time try use common solutions if it available. > > And > > please note, this is only performance wise on build stage it is not related in > > any user installation of package. > You are correct. But why make the builders cry if the solution is so simple ? Why cry??? If you build this package at home, its will be satisfied once. Most of builds I do on koji, there also no problem - plus few seconds... What problem you a inspired with it? > > > Epel lzo do not contain minilzo variant of package: > [...] > > So, should we try patch it use lzo instead? > Yes, pretty please. Yeh, ok, I'll try do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review