Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512639 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-21 02:47:12 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1488960 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fa34ab48dc174452c4d667ac9384d39727497190 ibus-table-translit-1.2.0.20090720.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ibus-table-createdb scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestion: 1) use configure instead autogen.sh 2)you already requires ibus-table then what is need to own %dir %{_datadir}/ibus-table %dir %{_datadir}/ibus-table/icons %dir %{_datadir}/ibus-table/tables 3)drop BuildRequires: gettext-devel >= 0.17, automake >= 1.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review